|
| |
"To Hold By The Sword" is a 32
page booklet investigating the 8 historic characters who held the title of Earl
of Chester from the city's capture in 1069, through to its reversion to the
English Crown in 1237. Virtually kings in their own right, these men held
Chester and its surrounding regions "by the sword" for and on behalf of the
legitimate English monarch for well over 150 years and ultimately helped to
create the city that stands today. Priced at £3.99, plus pack &
post,
| CHAPTER 1 |
INTRODUCTION
Despite his
emphatic military victory over the English forces at Hastings, William the
Duke of Normandy was not immediately welcomed or indeed accepted by the
majority of the civilian population of Britain. Although much of southern
England was said to have submitted to the new Norman monarch, the northern
regions were thought to have largely retained their fealty and faithfulness
to their earlier Anglo Saxon Lords.
Earl Edwin
and his brother Morcar, who were the sons of Leofric of Mercia were both
reported to have initially vowed loyalty to William and his administration,
but were later thought to have initiated widespread opposition to the
Normans and inevitably become the figureheads for the native English forces
that opposed the military subjugation of their country. Along with the Welsh
ruler of Gwynedd, Bleddyn ap Cynfyn, the two Anglo Saxon Earls were said to
have orchestrated regional opposition to the French occupation, from
Hereford in the south, through to York in the north.
In response
to this continuing resistance, William was reported to have brought more
French troops from the continent, as well as recruiting native Anglo Saxon
Lords and landowners who were sympathetic to his claim for the throne. Many
of these Norman supporters and particularly the leading Knights were
reported to be little more than paid mercenaries however, who undertook
their military service purely for personal gain, especially for the purpose
of acquiring lands and titles within the newly conquered Anglo Saxon
territories.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 2 |
WALTER DE
GERBOD
Although
generally acknowledged as the first Norman Earl of Chester to be appointed
by William I following his victory over the Anglo Saxon king Harold, Walter
has never received widespread recognition as the predecessor of the much
better known Hugh D’Avranches. This historical oversight might in part be
due to the fact that Gerbod was not regarded as the Earl of Chester in a
civilian sense, but was in fact a military leader who had been in the
military vanguard which had first pacified the region, rather than a later
civil administrator.
Most records
suggest that Walter had been actively involved in the subjugation of England
from the time of William’s victory at Hastings, but having served the new
king for a period of some four years, was anxious to return home to his
family estates in Flanders. As Chester was the final point of resistance to
Norman rule in England, it is entirely likely that Gerbod reluctantly agreed
to participate in the final military campaign which was waged against the
rebellious north western bases of the remaining Anglo Saxon
forces.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 3 |
HUGH “LUPUS”
D’AVRANCHES
Appointed by
William the Conqueror to replace Walter de Gerbod in 1071, Hugh was the son
of Richard of Goz, the Viscount of Avranches and Margaret, a sister of the
newly crowned English King. He was said to have had two sisters, Judith and
Mathilda and it was the second’s sister’s son Ranulph de Mescines who would
later be granted the Earldom of Chester by the king Henry I.
Although it
has often been presumed that Hugh was not present at Hastings due to his
youth, it has been suggested that he remained in Normandy ostensibly to
watch over the interests of his relatives that were campaigning in England,
but was said to have provided a large number of the ships that transported
William’s invasion force to England. It is known that William the Conqueror
returned to the continent after Hastings and returned to Britain in 1067 in
order to lead the militarily suppression of the rebel English nobles who
were challenging his right to rule the kingdom. Sometime after 1068 and
before receiving the Earldom of Chester, the young Hugh was recorded as
having held Tutbury Castle, which is thought to have been built in the first
round of Norman fortifications undertaken by William after his victory at
Hastings.
In addition
to his duties and responsibilities as the Earl of Chester, Hugh was also
thought to have been appointed as the “sword bearer” of England, a post
which involved the young Earl carrying the sword of St Edward, which is
alternatively known as the “Curtana”, or the “Sword of Mercy” at state
occasions. The weapon which is held by the British Museum bears the
inscription “Hugo comes Cestriae” which translates as “Hugh our brother at
Chester”. Married to Ermentrude of Claremont, Hugh was known to have had one
legitimate heir, although he was reported to have sired numerous
illegitimate children, most of which died in their infancy. His one and only
legitimate son Richard, later married Maud, daughter of Stephen of Blois,
who was a direct relative of William, the Duke of Normandy.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 4 |
RICHARD
D’AVRANCHES
When his
father Hugh Lupus died in July 1101 his 7 year old son Richard became heir
to the Earldom of Chester, but as he was a minor was reported to have become
the ward of the new king Henry I who had ascended the English throne in
1100, around a year before Hugh’s death.
With Henry as
his guardian, the young Richard was said to have been raised and educated
along with the monarchs own children at court, whilst at the same time his
inheritance and entitlements were administered by the king and his agents.
Towards the end of his minority, the young Earl was reported to have been
betrothed to Maud, the daughter of Stephen of Blois, a political union which
was designed to further strengthen the relationship between King Henry and
his young ward.
Having
reached his majority Richard was thought to have spent a good deal of time
at his family’s estates in Normandy, as well as at Chester. He was said to
have taken part in the military campaign against the rebel Welsh Prince
Gruffudd in 1114, but the Anglo-Norman force was unable to engage the
rebels in a decisive battle and so were forced to agree an uneasy peace,
which was to last through to the Welsh Prince’s death in
1137.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 5 |
RANULPH DE
MESCHINES
Thought to
have been born around 1070 in the Briquessart region of Normandy, Ranulph
succeeded to the Earldom of Chester following the untimely death of his
cousin, Richard D’Avranches, in the ill-fated “White Ship” disaster of 1120.
He was the eldest son of Mathilda, who was also known as Margaret, the
sister of the 2nd Earl Hugh D’Avranches, who had married Ranulph
de Meschines and was said to have had 2 younger brothers William and
Geoffrey.
Also known as
Ranulph of Briquesart, prior to being granted the Earldom of Chester he was
reported to have previously held the title of Earl of Carlisle, as well as
Viscount of Bayeux. However, on receiving the Earldom of Chester, Ranulph
was required by King Henry I to surrender his holdings and titles in
northern England, which he was said to have done gracefully.
Although the
historical records of both his tenure and achievements are minimal, the lack
of evidentiary materials seems to have little to do with Ranulph I himself,
but appears to be a reflection of the shortness of his tenure as Earl and
the fact that the northwest region of England was remarkably settled. Unlike
earlier and later holders of the Earldom, the turbulent border region
between England and Wales was reported to have been reasonably peaceful,
apart from a dispute in 1121 which necessitated the king, Henry I having to
lead a military campaign into the region to confront the forces of the Welsh
ruler Gruffudd ap Cynan, who was busily engaged in extending his power and
influence in North Wales.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 6 |
RANULPH DE
GERNONS
Unlike his
father, Ranulph II was neither an unremarkable or forgettable Earl of
Chester, but rather was renowned as probably the most ruthless and ambitious
individual ever to hold the title. He succeeded to the Earldom in 1129 and
in the following 24 years, up until his death in 1153, he rose to become one
of the most powerful and influential men in England.
When the
monarch Henry I died in 1135, he was succeeded to the English throne by his
nephew, the young Prince Stephen. However, his entitlement to rule was
immediately challenged by Henry’s daughter, the Empress Mathilda, the widow
of the Holy Roman Emperor Henry V who had later married Geoffrey of Anjou.
And who believed that her son Henry of Anjou was the legitimate heir to the
Crown. She had found support amongst a large number of the leading Barons of
England and her cause had been further helped by Stephen’s decision to seize
the lands and estates of these already disaffected noblemen. Mathilda was
also the aunt of Ranulph’s wife Maud and a sister of Robert Earl of
Gloucester, De Gernon’s father in law.
Between 1139
and 1145 England was in an almost continuous state of crisis, as the two
parties vied with one another for control of the country and the support of
the country’s leading noblemen. Robert, the Earl of Gloucester who was the
father-in-law of Ranulph II was reported to have been a noted campaigner for
the Angevin claims of Mathilda and this relationship was thought to have
been factor in Ranulph’s later decision to back the claim of the
Empress.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 7 |
HUGH DE
KEVELIOC
The eldest
son of Ranulph de Gernon, Hugh was reported to have been born at Gyffylliog
near Ruthin in North Wales in around 1147 and immediately inherited his
father’s title on Ranulph’s death in 1153. As he would have been only 6 or 7
years old at the time of his succession, it was usual practice for such
lands and estates to be managed on the minor’s behalf by an authorised
guardian appointed by the king. Although it isn’t entirely clear what
arrangements were made for the young Hugh Kevelioc, his inheritance of the
title seems to have coincided with the reigns of two English monarchs, King
Stephen who died in 1154 and his successor King Henry II who succeeded to
the throne in the same year. Either one of these monarchs may have acted as
a royal guardian for Hugh, until such time as he achieved his majority, but
exactly which one is unclear.
By around
1165 Hugh was thought to have reached his majority and become responsible
for the extensive lands and estates which had been bequeathed to him by his
late father and which made him one of the wealthiest and most influential
men in the whole of England. He was reported to have married Bertreda, the
daughter of Baron Simon de Montford a leading nobleman of the age and
between them had 6 children, Ranulph III, Maud, Mabel, Alice, Hawise and
Margaret.
Ranulph III who was surnamed Blundeville, from his
association with the market town of Oswestry in Shropshire, was Earl Hugh’s
only son and therefore his legal heir. He was known to have married
Constance of Brittany, the widow of Geoffrey of Plantagenet and mother to
Arthur Plantagenet, a later claimant to the English throne. Hugh’s eldest
daughter Maud was reported to have married David of Huntington and his
second daughter Mabel, married William D’Aubigny. His third daughter Alice
married William de Ferres and his fourth daughter Hawise married Robert de
Quincy. Hugh’s youngest daughter, Margaret married John de Lacy, an
individual whose successors would be inextricably linked to the Earls of
Chester.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 8 |
RANULPH
BLUNDEVILLE
Generally
associated with the Oswestry area of Shropshire, Ranulph Blundeville
succeeded his father Hugh II Keveliok as Earl of Chester in 1181 and
retained the title through to his own death in 1232, a period of 51 years.
He was thought to have inherited the title when he was only 11 years of age
and during his minority his inheritance was reported to have been
administered first by Gilbert Pipard and later by Bertram de Verdon on the
instructions of the monarch Henry II.
Unlike his
two immediate predecessors, his father and grandfather, Ranulph III does not
appear to have been involved in any plotting or scheming against the Crown,
but rather proved to be a highly pragmatic, politically astute individual
who sought to expand his holdings, wealth and influence through amicable and
astute relationships, as well as wise counsel. His first marriage, which was
almost entirely political for the 20 year old Ranulph, was to Constance of
Brittany, the widow of Geoffrey of Plantagenet and mother of Arthur
Plantagenet, a future claimant to the English Crown.
This
particular union made Ranulph III a son-in-law to the monarch Henry II and
to his successor Richard I, later more famously known as the “Lionheart”.
The marriage to Constance also entitled him as the Duke of Brittany as well
as Earl of Richmond. In 1194, the Earl of Chester was said to have famously
opposed King Richard’s younger brother Prince John, who tried to seize
control of England while his older sibling was held prisoner abroad. Along
with a number of other leading nobles, Blundeville was reported to have
besieged John and his supporters at Nottingham Castle, but it was only when
Richard finally returned to England later in the same year that the garrison
finally surrendered to the royalist forces. At Richard’s second coronation,
which took place at Winchester on 17th April 1194, Ranulph III of
Chester was reported to have carried the “Curtana” or the “Sword of Mercy”,
one of the 3 swords of state and signifying the young Earl’s high standing
within England.....(continued) |
| CHAPTER 9 |
JOHN THE SCOT
Because of
his uncle’s lack of a legitimate heir, the Earldom of Chester was
automatically granted to John, the son of Blundeville’s oldest sister Maud
and her husband David of Huntington. Although he inherited much of the late
Ranulph’s estates in and around Cheshire itself, large parts of the late
Earl’s holdings outside of the county were thought to have been divided up
between his surviving relatives. Initially content with their individual
legacies, unfortunately it wasn’t too long before certain beneficiaries and
their agents began to challenge their level of entitlement, causing the
matter to become embroiled in a mass of legal wrangling and extensive
litigation.
As for Earl
John himself, there appears to be little to singularly identify him as being
either notable or remarkable during his tenure at Chester, but rather he
seems to have been a fairly insignificant figure, when compared to his
better known and often nationally renowned ancestors. It has been said that
John was the last Norman Earl to carry the “Curtana” or “Sword of Mercy” at
the marriage of King Henry III to his future Queen, Eleanor. He also
benefited from the earlier peace agreements that had been made between the
English king, Henry III and the Welsh ruler Llewellyn ap Iorwerth which saw
the turbulent border region settled and peaceful. It was only in the same
year that Scot died, that the Welsh ruler himself was reported to have
suffered a stroke and then been succeeded by his two sons Dafydd and
Gruffudd who would later reignite the conflict between the two countries,
leading to further destruction and bloodshed.....(continued) |
|